Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Medical Marijuana Assistance Program of America


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. j⚛e deckertalk 00:56, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Medical Marijuana Assistance Program of America

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Campaign organization with no notability that I can detect.  Spinning Spark  17:59, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

delete a search on Google shows that there is no real relevance to it.Staglit (talk) 23:33, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:07, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:08, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:08, 23 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔  03:10, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

 Delete No demonstration of notability pertaining to this topic. I agree with Spinning Spark's assessment. --- Steve Quinn (talk) 06:02, 1 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep - Clearly passes WP:GNG / WP:ORGDEPTH as per having received significant coverage in reliable sources:
 * CNN
 * High Times
 * The Denver Post
 * Denver Westword
 * Huffington Post
 * Huffington Post
 * Huffington Post
 * Coloradoan.com
 * – NorthAmerica1000 17:28, 1 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 08:14, 8 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep, has news articles about it and only it, seems harmless. Abductive  (reasoning) 17:01, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep, per the sources Northamerica1000 located. I'm willing to pass off some of the sources as local, and The High Times is clearly not a disinterested observer, but the CNN and HuffPost  items are enough to qualify on their own.  -- RoySmith (talk) 00:20, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.