Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Medieval History Database


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 19:27, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

Medieval History Database

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Was de-PRODded without explaination, lacks notability. I was unable to find any additional sources, and the article as it stands relies on only the link to the site itself. Waxworker (talk) 18:29, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:52, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:31, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

*Delete News coverage is not enough for this history database. Citterz (talk) 18:03, 12 April 2021 (UTC) striking confirmed blocked sockpuppet, Atlantic306 (talk) 23:51, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - I can't find any independent coverage either. Fails WP:NWEB/WP:GNG. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:01, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment -- I have looked carefully at the website. There is no address; no indication of who is running it; nothing external to itself.  I therefore cannot judge the merits of the website.  I certainly cannot vote to keep it.  Peterkingiron (talk) 19:28, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. Totally murky, no sourcing--nothing. Drmies (talk) 20:34, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Per norm. Northern Escapee (talk) 07:13, 15 April 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.