Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MedjetAssist


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Due to lack of participation with no prejudice to a speedy relist. Davewild (talk) 14:29, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

MedjetAssist

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG and WP:CORP. Other than the one article from the Birmingham Business Journal, all of the references on the article are either unreliable sources, promotional in nature, or simply passing mentions of the company, separate from the substantive content of the story. Inks.LWC (talk) 22:26, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Inks.LWC (talk) 22:28, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Inks.LWC (talk) 22:28, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Alabama-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:56, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

I did some good research before creating this article. Actually, Medjet was the first to pioneer the air medical transport membership concept in the United States in 1991. Medjet is accredited by the Better Business Bureau with an A+ rating and seems to have a lot of articles written about them or are mentioned as one of the best options for supplemental travel insurance (in reliable sources independent sources, e.g., Forbes.com, latimes.com, yahoo.com, wsj.com). I strongly believe Medjet “is a valid subject for a separate Wikipedia article dedicated solely to that organization or product” because of the secondary sources found on the company here, here, here. Looking for further opinions by other editors. Mohith:) 13:20, 18 June 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 10:59, 21 June 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95  &#40; Talk &#41;  07:55, 28 June 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.