Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meeting


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep - nomination withdrawn due to sources provided.  Λυδ α  cιτγ  10:39, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

Meeting

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Impossible to expand beyond a dictionary definition and collection of related articles. Also see rationale of previous proposed deletion.  Λυδ α  cιτγ  04:31, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. North America1000 17:54, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America1000 17:54, 10 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep – GNG pass, with many book sources and academic research papers devoted entirely to the topic and aspects of it. The article could use some work, but it's a notable topic and term. Some source examples include, but are not limited to:, , , , , , , , , . North America1000 17:59, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep. The article is little more than a dicdef now, but there's considerable scope for expansion. Looking at the anthropology of meetings alone, there is enough literature for a lengthy encyclopaedia article . –&#8239;Joe (talk) 18:46, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep It is nothing like a dictionary definition as there no focus upon a particular word, its etmology and grammar. It is just another stub on an important and commonplace broad topic.  WP:DICDEF explains the difference and does not urge or specify deletion.  Andrew D. (talk) 08:07, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep No compliance with WP:Before.  Lots of sources, overriding concept – not just a dictionary definition.  WP:DICDEF explains the difference and does not urge or specify deletion.  Meets WP:GNG.  Obviously, can and should be expanded, but that is no ground to delete. 7&amp;6=thirteen (☎) 11:23, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's list of content for rescue consideration. -- 7&amp;6=thirteen (☎) 11:24, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
 * You're right, I failed to do WP:BEFORE, assuming that there wouldn't be any scholarly work on the topic of "meetings". I'm glad to learn that there is, and hope some of it can be incorporated into the article.  Λυδ α  cιτγ  10:33, 12 October 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.