Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meg Wolff


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 10:47, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

Meg Wolff

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Apparently non-notable. The "references" given in the article are just about macrobiotic diet in general. The "newspaper and magazine articles" section has two dead links, one blog post which quotes the article subject briefly, and one feature article from "an insert within the Portland Pres Herald" – i.e. a Parade magazine-style publication (but more obscure). None of this establishes notability. Googling around finds a few mentions on macrobiotic/cancer survivor blogs, but again nothing that gets this article over the bar. —  æk Talk 03:11, 22 December 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Timotheus Canens (talk) 00:41, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete The sources provided in the article show coverage of the subject exists, but don't show that significant coverage of the subject exists. I also note that one of the sources is a blog post. Ultimately, this fails WP:BIO. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 04:44, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.