Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mega Corporate Tower


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --BDD (talk) 19:58, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Mega Corporate Tower

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is obviously not notable. Jasper Deng (talk) 08:23, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment Can you explain why it is obviously non-notable, rather than pointing to some policy and not explaining why? Thanks.  Lugnuts  Dick Laurent is dead 09:33, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The writing's on the wall. The sources aren't really independent, are sparse, and most importantly there's no claim of notability (and the forum source is WP:SPS, to boot). I haven't been able to find significant coverage in reliable sources, particularly sources besides documents related to its construction (i.e. I want to see newspaper/magazine coverage).--Jasper Deng (talk) 11:35, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
 * weak delete Looking at our List of tallest buildings in Karachi this one is likely to top out in the first or second position. That said, it isn't built yet. It would make everyone's life bloody easier about these if people would wait until they're done to write articles, because this is one of those cases where this may end up being just another office building, or it might be notable simply for existing. I'd push for deletion more strongly if I didn't think there would be some chance of recreation due to its height. Mangoe (talk) 13:21, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 14:23, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 14:23, 24 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rschen7754 07:34, 2 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete One source is to a discussion forum, the other is a building listing site of some sort which only proves that this place exists. Nothing unique is popping up for news or even general hits. MezzoMezzo (talk) 03:42, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.