Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mega Man 9


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was  keep in light of recent announcements. No need to let this run. - hahnch e n 00:10, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

Mega Man 9

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Per CRYSTAL. Kimera Kat (talk) 11:47, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
 * WP:CRYSTAL, actually. --Shadow Hog (talk) 17:31, 24 June 2008 (UTC)


 * I suppose it may have been a bit early to create the article seeing as no further information (other than it exists, and several unverified claims) has stemmed forth; however, I'd petition that we keep the namespace available, seeing as the game IS confirmed to exist (with a valid source cited, at that), and information on the game WILL be coming sooner or later (my bet is E3 2008). It may now violate WP:CRYSTAL (not criterion 1, since the event is as good as confirmed, but perhaps criterion 2, seeing as only the game's existence and that it is multiplatform - generic information - is known) but I'm wagering it won't, very soon. --Shadow Hog (talk) 17:31, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep. It's been revealed in a scan. I'll look for it for a few minutes, but I have to leave soon. - A Link to the Past (talk) 17:43, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep pending this source; Abstain otherwise. --Shadow Hog (talk) 17:54, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: I think this is the source in question; scans from the next issue of Nintendo Power. Bigger scans would be better, but I doubt this is a hoax. --Shadow Hog (talk) 17:58, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Confirmed game. Toastypk (talk) 18:55, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Christian Svensson, Capcom's Sr. Director of Strategic Planning, confirmed on the Capcom forums that the article, hence the game, is real, and that there are still more details unrevealed. 216.80.38.172 (talk) 19:18, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep. The game has now been confirmed via this. Sources within the linked article. -- TRTX T / C 19:23, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Close debate. At the time of the debate starting, it was consisted of things such as "This has not been confirmed or announced by Capcom but we know it's in production because there's an unreliable obscure source that claims it!" Now, it's much better and confirmed by Capcom. Kimera Kat (talk) 21:35, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I dunno if I'd call the ratings board of a country an "obscure" source; although "unreliable" might be right. ;P --Shadow Hog (talk) 21:51, 26 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.