Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mega Man VI (Game Boy)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. W.marsh 05:27, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

Mega Man VI (Game Boy)
Another attempt at saturating wikipedia with nonsense. Don't allow the neat text and organization to make a bafoon of you. Speedy Delete Garbage. ZeroTalk 07:04, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: If you'd like to Speedy it, you may want to try delete or db-reason. Royboycrashfan 07:08, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
 * I thank you for that tidbit of information. I'll remember that in the future. -ZeroTalk 07:11, 3 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep: I see no grounds for a delete--let alone a speedy delete of this article--are you objecting to it because you don't like gamecruft?   Or is there another objection which we should know about?  There is much worse gamecruft on Wiki; this article looks well-written.  I cannot vouch for its accuracy, never having played the game--but I see no reason to delete this at this time.  --EngineerScotty 08:45, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
 * It's nonsense because such a iteration in the Mega Man series never existed and Capcom has not made confermation of releasing such a game. I respect your vote, but please refrain from making such when you know nothing of the source material. It is extemely irritating and misleading to other voters. -ZeroTalk 11:46, 3 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete since its nonsense. --Ter e nce Ong (恭喜发财) 12:25, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, no such game exists.  Starry Eyes  13:35, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Hoax. &mdash;Wrathchild (talk) 13:42, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom Maustrauser 13:45, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as hoax like all the other articles created by ProtomanX. (This one was the least obvious hoax, and looked most like a legitimate article). Kusma (討論) 14:33, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete if it is a hoax; however, I seem to be finding a lot of stuff on Google that would suggest otherwise. Can anyone give us some more info on why this a hoax? Peyna 15:56, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
 * I get it now. Re-state my vote as I am more sure now that this a hoax since while Mega Man VI does exist (see Mega Man 6, it was never released on Game Boy. Peyna 16:07, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, for one thing, the Game Boy Color didn't come out until 1998. All the game sites I looked had never heard of it. It's possible that it's supposed to be Mega Man 6, but that's for the NES. It does match the supposed release date, though. &mdash;Wrathchild (talk) 16:04, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
 * However, it looks like a copy-and-paste of Mega Man V (Game Boy). &mdash;Wrathchild (talk) 16:05, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
 * delete, hoax. RasputinAXP  talk contribs 15:58, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Took a little research, but delete as hoax. Mega Man 6 was only released for NES. Night Gyr 23:08, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
 * You could have simply made an inquiry on my talkpage. -ZeroTalk 23:11, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
 * I'd rather do the googling for myself than wait for a response. Night Gyr 00:47, 5 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.