Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Megabyte.KZ


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Apparently that AN discussion was quickly archived. Secret account 05:23, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Megabyte.KZ

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable company. The article is unsourced, I can't find any sources that mention it, and it reads just like any of the other non-notable company pages we get. However, the "Economics" section is a reasonable claim of importance; I can't find any publications verifying that economists have studied it, but if there are some, that should be sufficient for notability. Given that this is Kazakh, I'm not very well-suited for finding and reading sources, so I'd welcome anyone that can. Writ Keeper &#9863;&#9812; 14:23, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Kazakhstan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:07, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:07, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:07, 25 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. Article is about an online auction site in Kazakhstan.  Nothing suggests that this routine online business has had significant effects on history, technology, or culture. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 17:09, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete An article on a run-of-the-mill company referenced only to itself; no evidence found that it meets WP:NWEB or WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 20:19, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment The creator of this article is currently blocked for reasons that are as yet unknown. There is a discussion over at WP:AN that is looking into it. Can any decision regarding this article be put on hold until that is sorted out and the creator gets the opportunity to defend the article. AIR corn (talk) 21:52, 25 February 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.