Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Megan

Megan was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE

Wiktionary at best? See Meghan, which I Vfd'd above. (I rather agree WP isn't a baby-name book.) &#8212; Bill 01:51, 9 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * I would prefer not to see WP not head down this path. Delete.  Joyous 02:02, Oct 9, 2004 (UTC)
 * Please mentally remove a "not" of your choice from the above comment. And I even previewed.  Joyous


 * Delete. Perhaps someone might have the interest to create "Wikinames" or some such thing, but it doesn't belong here. Dsmdgold 02:48, Oct 9, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete.--Samuel J. Howard 03:09, Oct 9, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete: Betty, Liz, and Beth,/ All are known as Elizabeth. Geogre 18:46, 9 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wikipedia is not a baby name book. --Improv 19:15, 9 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Ambi 04:26, 10 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Apart from anything else, it's illiterate -- "Welch" indeed, in all modern usage it's "Welsh"! -- Arwel 10:55, 10 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Transwiki to wiktionary, which does have names (it may already be there, I dunno), then delete. Tuf-Kat 06:50, Oct 11, 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.