Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Megan Boyle


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:05, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Megan Boyle

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable individual lacking independent GHits and GNEWS of substance. Appears to fail WP:BIO.  ttonyb (talk) 00:21, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- -- Cirt (talk) 10:26, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete The subject has contributed to various small scale publications, and her debut collection is to come out from Muumuu House. Unfortunately for notability, that publisher is her husband. Now engaged in a 'film' venture (see Articles for deletion/MDMAfilms). While Tao Lin (her husband) appears to me to pass WP:BIO, I don't think this subject does. Not yet. I did enjoy her piece on Vague Relationships, and feel there could be a future in writing some more, shall we say, mainstream stuff. Peridon (talk) 11:23, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete this perhaps talented but so-far-unnoticed writer. EEng (talk) 00:20, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Completely fails WP:AUTHOR and WP:BK.  Certainly has issues of WP:SPA, and quite probably WP:COI and WP:AUTO as well. Qworty (talk) 02:17, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:36, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per Peridon. Seems to fail WP:BIO. -- Joaquin008  ( talk ) 16:41, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete as others have stated fails WP:BIO on many levels.Jimsteele9999 (talk) 19:56, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Not seeing any significant coverage in multiple reliable sources to meet WP:BIO. OhNo itsJamie Talk 22:16, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.