Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Megan Koester


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Cerebellum (talk) 13:14, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Megan Koester

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:BASIC and WP:AUTHOR. Little significant coverage in reliable secondary sources. Magnolia677 (talk) 11:56, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
 * delete wikipedia is not a promotional link for all and sundry Govindaharihari (talk) 14:56, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. North America1000 15:17, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. North America1000 15:17, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 15:18, 5 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep This comedian has a number of notable sources, Time magazine, etc., this person is notable, the article is still a stub yet there is enough media coverage to warrant an article. Neptune&#39;s Trident (talk) 16:08, 5 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete: Not seeing anything for WP:JOURNALIST and WP:GNG. can you list those "enough media coverage" either here or in article? I didn't find any (other than what is currently cited in article).  Anup   [Talk]  01:49, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
 * delete a news google fails to support notability.  The Time magazine article referenced above  certainly doesn't.E.M.Gregory (talk) 23:23, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment - possibly WP:TOOSOON? Bearian (talk) 17:24, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Definitely TOOSOON. I do think the Time source goes to notability, and here's another on the same incident, but it's still not significant coverage, and even if it were, there'd still be a WP:BIO1E problem. Innisfree987 (talk) 04:12, 20 November 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.