Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Megan Kufeld (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. J04n(talk page) 18:55, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Megan Kufeld
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

fails WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG Joeykai (talk) 21:52, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep - meets WP:GNG criteria. Article could use expansion per WP:ATD. Hmlarson (talk) 20:34, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails NFOOTY as has not played senior international football nor played in a fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy GNG, the comment above that GNG is met is erroneous as it ignores the fundamental element of GNG that sources must be independent of the subject. Though there are multiple sources in the article, there is very little presented out side of primary sources (e.g. University of Washington, Seattle Sounders, US Soccer websites, organisations with which the player was inherently related). Those third party sources present are brief in the extreme. Only this comes even close to being a source that could be used to justify GNG. Would need to see much more like this to be satisfied that GNG is met. Fenix down (talk) 08:20, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Fenix down (talk) 08:26, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 17:40, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as the article, however detailed, is still questionable for independent notability. SwisterTwister   talk  04:49, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  beans  // 06:56, 2 May 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. I think the sources cited in the article do add up to meet the threshold of WP:GNG. Local and specialist information sources are acceptable in establishing notability. Deryck C. 13:49, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep There is no need to pass FOOTY if she passes GNG. Agree with . Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:59, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 08:59, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. North America1000 11:55, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. North America1000 11:55, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 11:55, 9 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep Passes WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 01:58, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep The coverage about her is not just run-of-the-mill, it is significant enough to pass WP:GNG. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:27, 16 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.