Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Megan MacDonald


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  13:22, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

Megan MacDonald

 * – ( View AfD View log )

The subject fails both WP:GNG and WP:MUSICIAN. There's no significant coverage found, only passing mentions. Less Unless (talk) 09:24, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Less Unless (talk) 09:24, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. Less Unless (talk) 09:24, 6 November 2021 (UTC)


 * Weak keep: independent sources include coverage in national press and evidence of performance in relatively prestigious and notable events, although overall fairly minor. I think this is borderline but lean towards keep. Foonblace (talk) 14:06, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: Aside from one source, none of the references cited in the article discuss MacDonald herself in any detail and BEFORE searches do not return any additional sources that could be used to build the article. I originally PROD'd this article but the PROD was contested.  So I support this AFD as I really don't think GNG or MUSICIAN are met here. DocFreeman24 (talk) 14:14, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:38, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: Have been tracking since an apparent newbie SPA created the draft and moved to mainspace bypassing AfC scutiny. I did a little technical clerking but had notability concerns at the time.  I noticed on dePROD there was a suggestion a band might be notable, and despite a single award that didn't seem to be an alternative move/target.  Should other RS be found happy to change mind.  Doesn't seem a TOOSOON article to draft either, again happy if I am proved wrong.  Thankyou. Djm-leighpark (talk) 21:53, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: Does not meet WP:GNG test Coldupnorth (talk) 09:53, 9 November 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.