Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Megan McKenna


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep - Well it would seem she is indeed notable so I'm wrapping this up (Admittingly the cites aren't amazing but notability's certainly there). (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 22:28, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Megan McKenna

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non notable actress "reality TV show participant", Way WP:TOOSOON atm, I originally redirected to Ex on the Beach (series 3) but disagrees so here we are (I personally think redirecting to Ex on the Beach (series 3) is the best option atm until she becomes notable.). – Davey 2010 Talk 21:46, 15 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep She's not known as an actress, she's notable as a reality TV participant. There's no reason 'Ex on the Beach' would be a reidrect target for her, as 'Celebrity Big Brother 17' would be equally relevant, Britain's Got Talent much less so. Meets WP:GNG and certainly WP:BASIC: People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject. If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability; trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources may not be sufficient to establish notability. I'm not a particular fan of celebrities best known for being celebrities but she meets the guidelines. Boleyn (talk) 21:55, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Jesus fucking christ you always get one!, I've amended it ... Are we happy now?, Bollocks she doesn't meet GNG whatsoever or even BASIC for that matter!, Well okay if we can't agree on a redirect target then lets just outright delete it!. – Davey 2010 Talk 22:05, 15 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Redirect and if you check into "reality TV" you will quickly find it is not reality, its acting. Needs to meet WP:NMODEL which covers entertainers Legacypac (talk) 21:59, 15 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.