Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Megan Pormer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 06:42, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

Megan Pormer

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A great deal of PR, but no substantial accomplishments in any of several careers. The refs are none of them substantial, or even reliable.  DGG ( talk ) 05:27, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:27, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:27, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:27, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:27, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:27, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:28, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:28, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:29, 1 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete I agree with DGG, especially on the sources, one of which is even IMDB. WP:N isn't reached. Geoffroi (talk) 20:22, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete just having a PhD does not make one notable. A postion given to someone when they were 5 does not make one notable, unless that is a position as ruler of a country or in some other way attached to power. There is nothing substantive, and when you are bottom barreling by mentioning an appearance in a vapid reality TV show, it is a strong sign the person is not actually notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:46, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete – I think this is a borderline one, due to sources such as    . But none of these sources quite get me over the line of being significant coverage in independent reliable sources to meet WP:BASIC, and I see no other evidence of notability. – Levivich  05:51, 5 June 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.