Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Megan and Liz (5th nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talk about my edits? 12:36, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

Megan and Liz
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

For all reasons listed in past deletion debates. They don't meet WP:GNG all of their citations come from social networking sites because of the scarce amount of reliable sources on them. This is a joke of an article. Put it out of it's misery. | help dןǝɥ  | 23:09, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:56, 8 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep Haha, they seem to pick up an RS every second AfD. Currently: Oprah appearance, Niles Daily Star, Newsday, Billboard (coverage a result of charting in Billboard's new Social 50 chart). 86.44.31.213 (talk) 01:55, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep - Do we really need to go trough this again?.. By the fifth AfD nomination it should stand quite clear that these girls passes WP:MUSIC.--BabbaQ (talk) 19:20, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. I was on the fence last time around; given the choice between keeping or deleting, I prefer the former as coverage (cited above by 86.44.31.213) in independent reliable sources does exist for this duo.  Gongshow  Talk 05:42, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.