Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meggan Scavio


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. SNOW. (non-admin closure)  Eostrix  (&#x1F989; hoot hoot&#x1F989;) 09:53, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

Meggan Scavio

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Promotional CV style piece about a person not yet shown to meet Wikipedia's notability criteria for biographies of living people. All of the sources appear to be from publications close to the subject, none of which are listed on WP:RSP there is no indication of WP:ANYBIO the only accolade they have is a mention in a listicle for variety magazine. The entire page is essentially built on marcomms puffery. Therefore, this article is nothing more than puffery. Ferkingstad (talk) 13:28, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:12, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:12, 20 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep per WP:BASIC; the article is written in a neutral tone and multiple independent sources are listed as reliable at WP:RSP (i.e. WP:VARIETY, CNET, VentureBeat) and WP:VG/RS; more from Variety based on her recognition as a 2018 Variety 500 Honoree is here. Beccaynr (talk) 15:34, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep as argued by . XOR&#39;easter (talk) 17:37, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep. Appears to pass WP:GNG per independent and in-depth sources already in the article. One of nine likely bad-faith nominations in reaction to the deletion of the nominator's article at Articles for deletion/VIDA Select. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:37, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep - article already establishes notability Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:58, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep on a procedural basis as the nomination rationale has no merits. Refer to the nominator's talk page exchange with User:StarryGrandma, they are disrupting Wikipedia to prove a point. Suggest an administrator snow keep this nomination and perhaps sanction or warn the nominator for their disruptive behaviour. Haleth (talk) 09:44, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep More than enough to satisfy WP:SIGCOV and clearly notable enough for WP:BIO.   scope_creep Talk  12:12, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep Per above reasons. LaryFoxBoy (talk) 03:30, 22 August 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.