Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meghna (character)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 22:17, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

Meghna (character)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails Notability (fiction). Sources only mention character name and nothing else. Most sources just say "Sameera Reddy reminisces "Vaaranam Aayiram". Not a notable character. Sources include blogposts (unreliable). Merging this page to Vaaranam Aayiram is a good option too. --DareshMohan (talk) 19:33, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Source 1 - The Times of India: mentions the character name and nothing else
 * Source 2 - Facebook post by Sameera Reddy
 * Source 3 - India Today: Sameera reminisces Vaaranam Aayiram
 * Source 4 - Rediff: Mentions character name once
 * Source 5 - TikToker recreation
 * Source 6 - Pinkvilla: Sameera reminisces Vaaranam Aayiram
 * Source 7 - JFW: Shows Twitter post of Sameera
 * Source 8 - lavanyagurumurthy: Blogpost about character
 * Source 9: MyKollywood: Shows Twitter post of Sameera
 * Source 10 - Medium: Blog of a random person's train journey
 * Source 11 - jessynaija: Video from movie
 * Source 12 - Twitter: Fan theory
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:15, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:15, 15 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete per lack of WP:SIGCOV. Waddles 🗩 🖉 20:37, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable on its own per above. Cannot be redirected either because there are plenty of other films with a character named Meghana -- Ab207 (talk) 08:53, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Merge to Vaaranam Aayiram. There is a reception section but it is badly written, with most sentences beginning with " Many fans and audiences" and half of them referenced to blogs on Wordpress, the other, to some minor niche website. WP:SYSTEMATICBIAS is an issue. Some of the reception - the ones that's not based on blogs - might be salvageable by merging. But overall GNG seems not met. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 09:59, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Sources fail to demonstrate notability. Avilich (talk) 19:55, 20 December 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.