Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mehmet Mustafaoğlu (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:54, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Mehmet Mustafaoğlu
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

Lack of independent citations to confirm notability. Nipsonanomhmata (talk) 02:39, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
 *  Keep  Enough notable (sources +Award). Valid entry Rirunmot (talk) 09:53, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete: The two existing references did not link to anything. Nor was an article quoted. Both citations were bogus. The two awards are not, in themselves, notable enough to support the existence of this article. Nipsonanomhmata (talk) 11:36, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
 * An award is an award, regardless your opinion Rirunmot (talk) 11:29, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete as unsourced BLP. Honorary consuls are not inherently notable per our normal guidelines, as far as I know (no matter if their country is diplomatically recognized or not), and there seems to be little else that could make him notable. Fut.Perf. ☼ 13:54, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cyprus-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:00, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:00, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Logan Talk Contributions 06:09, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep: Several sources added to confirm awards. This person clearly was notable in the 1990s and early 2000s in the TRNC world and Petroleum industries. Article needs work but should not be deleted. Plus, everyone should review the first Afd which resulted in a very strong keep consensus. --Mike Cline (talk) 14:58, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Delete - The first citation is from an internet forum; certainly not a reliable source. The final two (of three) are both trivial mentions with the last one only having his name in a list with multiple other individuals. If the last one were to prove any notability at all we have dozens of new articles to add about people with very little information publicly available. WikiManOne (talk) 06:43, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.