Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mehr Hassan (3rd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 08:21, 12 May 2024 (UTC)

Mehr Hassan
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:Notability Wikibear47 (talk) 17:42, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Women. Wikibear47 (talk) 17:42, 13 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Keep: Has been in multiple films that seem to have wikipedia articles of their own. As per: WP:ARTIST, criteria 3, that should probably be enough.
 * also, seems like this is the 3rd nomination. User:Sawerchessread (talk) 17:59, 13 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Dance, Music, Fashion, Pakistan, Punjab,  and Kentucky.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  18:07, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: The newspapers used now in the article for sourcing are all there is for this person; I don't see notability beyond the local level. I can't find any mention of them otherwise. Oaktree b (talk) 19:25, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete The fact she has been seen on multiple movies which has a wikipedia page doesn't qualify her to have a wikipedia page. This is just like the case of Lucy Grantham (2nd nomination). The subject Mehr Hassan fails WP:GNG. Her first AFD which was keep was just a two vote of keep which was still saying because she appeared in a movie. No independent reliable source, No award won or being nominated as an actress or dancer. I really don't see anything notable. --Meligirl5 (talk) 17:56, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep: Meets WP:NACTOR with significant roles in multiple notable films. The Louisville Courier article too makes a case for notability. - My, oh my! (Mushy Yank)  22:56, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Does having just one reliable source qualifies a person of having a Wikipedia page?

Hassan started her dancing career as a stage performer in the United States.

How do we believe such statement with no reliable source.?--Meligirl5 (talk) 00:45, 17 April 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:08, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep. Meets WP:NACTOR, which is clearly the applicable guideline. rspεεr (talk) 14:30, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Relisting comment: I'm familiar with a "Soft Delete" but can anyone define a "Soft Keep" for me? Do you mean "Weak Keep"? Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:51, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep. WP:NACTOR appears to hold here for now, although perhaps the articles for the films she starred should be reviewed for their notability. The bottom line is that long as those films are notable, she is, if barely. Stefen Towers among the rest!   Gab • Gruntwerk 16:00, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Relisting comment: Final relist. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 11:52, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep Meets WP:NACTOR at this point for the roles in notable films she starred in.  Coco bb8  (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 13:07, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete: The subject's claim of appearing in numerous films lacks verifiable evidence, thus failing to meet WP:ARTISTS. The available coverage appears to be routine per WP:ROTM and lacks the depth required by WP:GNG. — Saqib  ( talk  |  contribs ) 15:57, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
 * The Courier-Journal article wasn't routine, and by what sources we have, Hassan was in these films, noting that the sourcing of the related film articles was light (thus my 'Weak Keep'). I suspect however that her appearance in some of them was exaggerated to make it appear she was a lead when she wasn't. Stefen Towers among the rest!   Gab • Gruntwerk 16:52, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete as no evidence of any notability, The Courier-Journal is great however unfortunately it's no where near enough to establish notability, Not sure if her roles have been major or minor but either way I cannot find any evidence of any notability, Fails NACTOR and GNG. – Davey 2010 Talk 15:50, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
 * WP:NACTOR says "The person has had significant roles in multiple notable films" and we know she was in several notable films (i.e., films with articles). If you're saying the subject fails NACTOR, are you saying these linked films should be reviewed in AfD? Stefen Towers among the rest!   Gab • Gruntwerk 16:58, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
 * But NACTOR  states The person has had significant roles in multiple notable films  which I can't see reflected here. — Saqib  ( talk  I  contribs ) 17:01, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
 * The "Partial filmography" in the article links to five notable films (currently adjudged by Wikipedia) and I suppose it's our opinion as to whether her roles were significant in them. It's part of why I say "Weak Keep" as I don't want to overjudge. Stefen Towers among the rest!   Gab • Gruntwerk 17:06, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
 * It's hard to say whether she fails NACTOR #1 but personally I would say she does and despite the The Courier-Journal link imho she still fails #2 too, FWIW all of her roles could've been one-bit/minor roles so article linkage doesn't mean anything here, (and leading on to your last point nicely) There's just not enough info to determine whether she meets NACTOR #1 or not but either way I would obviously say she still fails #2, Thanks. – Davey 2010 Talk 17:30, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
 * In NACTOR, it says #1 or #2. The subject doesn't have to meet both criteria to pass it. I accept that we would need to judge whether the roles are significant but as it was difficult, source-wise, to drill down on these films, I don't want to rush to judgment, thus my "Weak Keep". I still say the key here is to look at the film articles and see if they should be kept. Stefen Towers among the rest!   Gab • Gruntwerk 17:38, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
 * I've checked the articles and their sources as well as looked online - The Gold Bracelet is just about notable with the rest not being notable so imho one notable film and one notable paper cite is still not enough irrespective of what role she played, I guess the article can be redirected to The Gold Bracelet if really desired,
 * You're more than welcome to search for these films for yourself and judge for yourself, Thanks, – Davey 2010 Talk 17:54, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Thank you for welcoming me to do something I've already done. :) So, if only one film is notable, why do the others have articles? (can be taken as a rhetorical question) Stefen Towers among the rest!   Gab • Gruntwerk 17:57, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. If you've searched these articles before now then why the fuck are you here questioning their notability ?. Go nominate them if you think they're not notable.
 * Because get this Stefen - some articles go undetected and unnoticed, ever thought about that ?, I suspect not :). – Davey 2010 Talk 18:06, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Also for future reference go read WP:BLUDGEON. You've !voted keep so as such you don't need to reply to every single delete !vote regurgitating the same line again and again. – Davey 2010 Talk 18:08, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
 * This is a discussion, and it is eminently reasonable to challenge a position. Stefen Towers among the rest!   Gab • Gruntwerk 18:11, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
 * I don't see the need for you to be cross with me here. I have been professional and I expect the same in return. The fact that the articles exist show that they are currently presented as notable subjects, whether they deserve this determination or not. I may well prod the articles in question, but for the time-being, they cannot be dismissed. Stefen Towers among the rest!   Gab • Gruntwerk 18:09, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete No indication of significance. Fails WP:NACTOR. Perhaps WP:TOOSOON, but there nothing here to indicate a pass on WP:SIGCOV.   scope_creep Talk  12:44, 10 May 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.