Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mekavaripalem


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. The article needs to be expanded, but its about a real place and the problems listed by the nominator have been remedied. (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:52, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Mekavaripalem

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

If this is a location, it is an unreferenced WP:NOTESSAY/WP:OR. Would need a dose of WP:TNT to make it encyclopedic. &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(talk)  04:54, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
 *  Delete Keep. Incoherent to the point of being patent-nonsense (and so tagged). Also suspect a misspelled Makavarapalem (thereby solidifying opposition to this article). Pax 07:16, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Addendum. I trashed the entirely of the rambling OR, and the article is now a single sentence asserting a town in India. Pax 10:17, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment While it could be a mispelled Makavarapalem, Google Maps seems to recognize each as distinct locations, 150km apart.  The region identified as 'Mekavaripalem' looks from aerial/satellite imagery to actually be a town.--Robin Thayler (talk) 10:45, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. Makavarapalem is in the Visakhapatnam district, Mekavaripalem is in the Krishna district. The article has colorful and potentially encyclopedic content, but needs to be completely rewritten. Until then, stub seems the best compromise.--Robin Thayler (talk) 10:57, 12 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep – Needs all the unencyclopedic junk removed. Will start on that now. —&#160;&#160;  &#160;&#160;Bill W.&#160;&#160;  &#160;&#160; (Talk)&#160;&#160;(Contrib)&#160;&#160; (User:Wtwilson3) &#160;&#160;— 12:30, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:58, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.