Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melanie Irons


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Stifle (talk) 10:39, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Melanie Irons

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A lady who created a popular Facebook page. By this definition a bunch of my mates are notable for their own articles. The only claim to notability is the Australian Story documentary, and I don't think that's sufficient on its own. The Drover&#39;s Wife (talk) 06:42, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
 * I will note, that is not her only claim to notability. She is also an actress in a popular web series, on the council of a Tasmania State Government agency, Australia Day Ambassador, Young Australian of the Year finalist, Resilient Australia Award winner, and covered in the many news articles linked.  JT dale Talk ~ 08:42, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
 * These look good on a resume, but I don't think any of them, or all of them combined, amount to notability. An article on someone who had done one of these things would get nominated for deletion in a heartbeat. I don't think it makes a huge difference to someone's notability if they've done five of them. The Drover&#39;s Wife (talk) 11:40, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Definitely, one of these things would mean nothing, but multiple things do pile up.  JT dale Talk ~
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  09:37, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  09:37, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  09:38, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  01:48, 15 January 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Keep. Well known in a number of different areas - all well referenced. Wikipedia is not paper. -- Chuq (talk) 00:17, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, N ORTH A MERICA 1000 00:04, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Weak keep - terrible stub, but she appears to be famous down under for her advocacy. Bearian (talk) 21:28, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
 * please explain what you mean by famous, famous does not mean necessarily notable on WP. LibStar (talk) 14:55, 29 January 2015 (UTC)


 * delete if she was actually young Australian of the year for her state she would pass but the other awards are minor. but I don't believe the totality of coverage meets WP:BIO. And needs multiple roles to meet WP:NACTOR LibStar (talk) 14:58, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.