Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melanie Mudry


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Miss Connecticut USA. (non-admin closure) SST  flyer  05:29, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

Melanie Mudry

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Mudry is a little different from other state Miss USA winners, since she is a perenial compoetitor. However a bunch of runner-up titles and a state Mrs. America title do not seem to be enough to make being a beauty pageant contestant move into the level of notability. John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:05, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 03:41, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 03:41, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 03:41, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 03:41, 4 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete, not notable enough for stand alone article. Kierzek (talk) 02:55, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Miss Connecticut USA Definitely not notable enough for a separate article. Subjects best known for winning a state level pageant are not inherently notable. I would prefer a redirect to Miss Connecticut USA instead of outright deletion as a mention is already present on the target page (in the list of winners). --Lemongirl942 (talk) 10:49, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Miss Connecticut USA; valid search term, and the subject is listed there. North America1000 01:38, 10 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.