Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melanie Scalera


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy deleted under criteria CSD by User:Mfield. -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 03:30, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Melanie Scalera

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Does not appear to be a notable person. Has appeared in only four bit parts according to imdb IndulgentReader (talk) 07:38, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  -- KuroiShiroi (contribs) 11:46, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions.  -- KuroiShiroi (contribs) 11:46, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable person. feydey (talk) 13:19, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

Um, I think I know who I am and have been in films, major and local and am pretty much well known in my state. It is really rude and predjuced for you to assume that I am a nobody you are probably from some other country, how could you possibly know what goes on about Rhode Island. Edit things and put in your 2 cents about things you actually know about! These editors who think they know it all are obviously biased and have no clue what they are doing! Time to find new editors!--72.200.180.60 (talk) 07:38, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
 * — 72.200.180.60 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

Really, wiki, you need new editors. I can get over 1,000 people on here to sign a petition verifying that Miss Melanie Scalera is pretty well known around here in this community! There is just no reason why these so called 'editors' should act like they know things they do not. If you don't know, then leave it alone!--Mellrocks (talk) 07:48, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
 * — Mellrocks (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.


 * Strong delete. Yes, she has four movies listed by her name at IMDB; however, three of those state she was "uncredited" for the part. The fourth, Unexpected Company, was an eight-minute short. Nothing in the article demonstrates that she meets WP:ENTERTAINER, and being well-known locally does not equate to notability in the Wikipedia sense. —C.Fred (talk) 12:40, 28 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete. Fails WP:ENTERTAINER, WP:PROMOTION, WP:CONFLICT. Failed an AfC request (apparently by the article's subject) on 20 April 2007; the admin closing it wrote in part, "Declined. This suggestion doesn't sufficiently explain the importance or significance of the subject."  So, the subject, who uses at various times both an anon ip as well as User:Mellrocks, created the article herself in March 2009.  Jim Ward (talk/stalk) 15:31, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

DREAM FOCUS IS ONE TO TALK...CHECK OUT THE GRAMMAR ON HIS OWN USER PAGE...HE ALSO STATES HE NOMINATED HIMSELF ON SOMETHING FOR WIKI? SOUNDS HYPOCRITICAL. DID WE MENTION HE IS WRONG? MELANIE DID NOT CREATE THE PAGE HERSELF. THIS IS A COMPUTER USED BY A RI FILM COMMUNITY!
 * Delete You can't make your own page. Her IP address was used to create it, and then comment on the talk page stating she was the one the article was about.   D r e a m Focus  21:47, 28 March 2009 (UTC)


 * STRONG KEEP FIRST OF ALL MELANIE SCALERA'S ARTICLE WAS NOT SUBMITTED AND WRITTEN BY HERSELF (SHE HAD WROTE POSTING SHE WAS HERSELF ONCE SHE SAW PEOPLE WANTING THIS DELETED-SHE GOT VERY OFFENDED; WE ARE A FILM GROUP AND CASTING AGENCY IN RI (RIFC AND LDI CASTING). APPARENTLY ALL EDITORS KNOW EVERYTHING THOUGH, RIGHT? FURTHERMORE, IF YOU KNEW ANYTHING, YOU CAN'T JUST POST YOURSELF ON IMDB. THERE HAS TO BE PROOF YOU WERE IN A FILM. WE TRIED TO POST A RANDOM NAME AND IT HAD TO BE UNCREDITED, SINCE YOU CREDITED ONES MUST BE SUBMITTED BY PUBLISHERS. AND IT WON'T ACCEPT UNCREDITED NAMES WITHOUT ANY CREDITED REFERENCES FIRST. ALSO, HER INFO ON IMDB AND THE REST OF THE ONLINE WORLD IN CONSTANTLY INCREASING, SINCE YOU NEED TO SEE MORE INTERNET REFERNCES. SO PLEASE DO NOT GET INVOLVED IN SOMETHING YOU KNOW NOTHING ABOUT ONCE AGAIN. WE THANK YOU.--RIFILM (talk) 03:04, 31 March 2009 (UTC) — RIFILM (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.


 * Delete, this should have been a speedy A7, not even an AfD. Ridiculously unnotable person and both accounts, IP should be blocked for sock/meat puppetry. Fails WP:N, WP:BIO, WP:ENTERTAINER and WP:NOT. -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 03:17, 31 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom.   — Jeff G. (talk&#124;contribs) 03:19, 31 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.