Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melanie Specht


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep, though sourcing should be worked on (non-admin closure)  Snuggums ( talk  /  edits ) 16:19, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Melanie Specht

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:ENTERTAINER, has done nothing notable, all small roles most of them nameless such as "Receptionist", "Nurse", "Burger Chick". LADY LOTUS • TALK 15:54, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:22, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:22, 21 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep: Though I agree with nominator that she has done small roles such as "Receptionist", "Nurse", "Burger Chick", her selection in the robots-dominated Transformers: Age of Extinction, made her notable.


 * How she could be non-notable when she becomes 96th place in the world's largest and best-selling men's magazine Men's Health selection, as one of the 100, The Hottest Women of 2014.


 * Those who have come 97th, 98th, 99th and 100th have got already pages on Wikipedia.


 * Taryn Manning(97th)
 * Rachel Nichols(98th)
 * Erin Heatherton(99th)
 * Tatiana Maslany(100th)


 * The selections in Transformers: Age of Extinction and Men's Health proves her notability.Chandana Jayasinghe(Sri Lanka) (talk) 00:36, 24 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Her role in Transformers did NOT make her notable, she doesn't have a notable role, she's Joshua's assistant, doesn't even have a name. I've seen it multiple time and STILL couldn't tell you which one she is. Thus failing WP:ENTERTAINER. And bringing up other pages is just WP:WAX, we are talking about Specht not them. The Men's Magazine is a mere mention, doesn't surpass WP:GNG with significant coverage. LADY LOTUS • TALK 10:57, 24 October 2014 (UTC)


 * I have seen the Transformers once; that is a robot-dominated movie; they are the heroes and villains. Melanie Specht's selection to the multi-million dollar($210million) movie is an implied Notability to the subject


 * Your Statement: "And bringing up other pages is just WP:WAX, we are talking about Specht not them."
 * According to WP:WAX: "..........While these comparisons are not a conclusive test, they may form part of a cogent argument; an entire comment should not be dismissed because it includes a comparative statement like this."


 * Your Statement: "The Men's Magazine is a mere mention, doesn't surpass WP:GNG with significant coverage."
 * My Comment: That is your POV; The Men's Magazine's consideration to compare Melani Specht with other celebrities is an implied Notability to the subject.


 * Chandana Jayasinghe(Sri Lanka) (talk) 18:15, 24 October 2014 (UTC)


 * You keep saying "a robot-dominated movie", we aren't talking about the movie, we are talking about her and her insignificant role in. Per WP:ENTERTAINER, an actor should have


 * 1) Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions. She doesn't
 * 2) Has a large fan base or a significant "cult" following. She doesn't.
 * 3) Has made unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment. She hasn't.


 * Thus fails notability. LADY LOTUS • TALK 18:34, 24 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Fine. She doesn't or she hasn't any of those to meet the WP:ENTERTAINER as you suggest; can you explain then why;


 * Michael Bay selected her in the multi-million dollar project?


 * Why Men's Health (magazine), the world's largest men's magazine brand, with 40 editions in 47 countries and the the best-selling men's magazine on U.S. newsstands, compared her with other Notable celebrities?


 * If you couldn't answer properly, then she may meet at least one of those you have highlighted, but we are not aware of it.Chandana Jayasinghe(Sri Lanka) (talk) 05:12, 25 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep per Chandana Jayasinghe passes WP:GNG marginally there is a coverage     .Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 03:06, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.