Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melatonin Magik


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Jayjg (talk) 01:46, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

Melatonin Magik

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Contested PROD. Non-notable future album per WP:CRYSTAL and WP:NALBUMS. References are currently a social networking site, blog and press release. Steamroller Assault (talk) 23:26, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom. RP459 (talk) 23:38, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  —  Gongshow  Talk 23:39, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:NALBUMS: "unreleased albums are in general not notable" but may be "if they have significant independent coverage in reliable sources"; this album does not. TheJazzDalek (talk) 13:00, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep the sources are from reliable official press releases and confirmed Hip Hop articles published online, and the record label War Lab confirms this release. MarioVega0 (UTC)
 * Keep Seems to be legit. A quick google search turns up tons of underground hiphop sites and official press releases on it. Zodiiak (talk) 08:02, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Verifiability, while indeed an issue is not the heart of the matter here. The main issue is if it has received significant independent coverage in reliable sources, which means it needs to be more in-depth than "Canibus is working on a new album to be called Melatonin Magik." If you have found coverage of substance in a reliable source (i.e. not a blog or press release), please update the article or at least post the link here so someone else can. TheJazzDalek (talk) 12:05, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Nobody is questioning if the album is scheduled to be released or not. But there is a definate lack significant coverage by reliable, third party sources (and no, hip-hopkings.com is not a reliable source). No confirmed track list. As such, it fails WP:ALBUMS, WP:CRYSTAL and WP:HAMMER. Niteshift36 (talk) 21:32, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.