Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melbourne IT


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep.  (aeropagitica)   (talk)   15:21, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Melbourne IT
I don't find Melbourne IT noteworthy enough for Wikipedia and the article to me seems more like an advertisement. RobertM 21:13, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Could certainly use cleanup, but I think it's noteworthy as a commercial .au registrar.  It's also one of the larger domain name registrars, if I'm not mistaken, though at around #5 or #6 on the list, it might be borderline for notability. Shimeru 21:34, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions.   -- Mako 21:49, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. The history of it taking over domain registration in Australia from Robert Elz makes this article notable in itself. --Bduke 23:01, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep and cleanup. Listed on the stock exchange and its role as a registrar makes it notable enough for mine. Capitalistroadster 02:41, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought Melbourne IT was the sole registrar of the .au domain (or maybe just .com.au) until auDA (.au Domain Administration) took over in 2001? Certainly a notable part of internet history in Australia. --Canley 02:58, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep --Ansett 05:50, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per Capitalistroadster, subject is notable as a commercial registrar. Yamaguchi先生 23:44, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep A notable company (As per comments above) + listed on the Australian Stock Exchange.Rafy 17:08, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.