Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melekwe Anthony E.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  13:54, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

Melekwe Anthony E.

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Spam, not a single reliable source showing the notability (though poems were indeed published in some of the sources). Ymblanter (talk) 21:16, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. Ymblanter (talk) 21:16, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Ymblanter (talk) 21:16, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
 * delete I failed to find any in-depth coverage. Loew Galitz (talk) 21:33, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:57, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:58, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete — For reasons stated by, I do not see any sng met let alone our general notability threshold. Celestina007 (talk) 23:23, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Don't Delete - This piece was shortly moved to the article section and in that short while, I have seen many edits done to improve the article. It already contains a vest amount of information, an above average citation and let's not forget this article covers the life of a living breathing human being. Don't delete, improve. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.190.31.17 (talk) 07:28, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
 * The 'living breathing human being' aspect is in no way relevant Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:08, 13 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep - I agree. The author is a famous Writer well published in newspapers, magazines and has edited many works across Nigeria. I myself was required to read one of them for an exam last year. I really hope we are not nominating this article to be deleted because he is Nigerian and we feel it's not relevant. Tombarks WP:SOCKSTRIKE see Sockpuppet investigations/Anthonyjmel  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:54, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
 * @, you have just casted a egregious aspersion not only to but against the entire collaborative project. Please see WP:AGF and WP:ATA. Celestina007 (talk) 21:23, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
 * @, If it seems that way, I apologise. That was and still isn't the intention. But Wikipedia clearly states that a topic is considered Notable Enough to have its own article so long it does not go against the "What Wikipedia is not" policy and the general notability guidelines (GNG), all of which this article does not go against.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 01:01, 18 January 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   15:44, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - This same policy also states and I quote "Determining notability does not necessarily depend on things such as fame, importance, or popularity." The very three concepts sort after before this enquiry begun and yet bare no guarantee for the deletion of this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tombarks (talk • contribs) > WP:SOCKSTRIKE see Sockpuppet investigations/Anthonyjmel  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:54, 3 February 2022 (UTC) You can’t !vote more than once. Celestina007 (talk) 22:49, 25 January 2022 (UTC) > You can't keep deleting votes because they do not align with yours.
 * Second vote of the creator of the article.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:04, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * don't delete, this is tricky and let us be civil. But even said the guy has published poems. That sounds reliable to me.  blocked WP:SOCK see User:Simpson001 at Sockpuppet investigations/Anthonyjmel  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:13, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Less Unless (talk) 08:07, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete- I agree with Celestina007. VincentGod11 (talk) 17:20, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Previous concerns regarding this article have been resolved.Tombarks (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 21:58, 25 January 2022 (UTC)   WP:SOCKSTRIKE see Sockpuppet investigations/Anthonyjmel  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:54, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Third vote of the same user--Ymblanter (talk) 22:01, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
 * The above is not a vote. Your counting is inaccurate. Tombarks (talk) 07:04, 26 January 2022 (UTC) WP:SOCKSTRIKE see Sockpuppet investigations/Anthonyjmel  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:55, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
 * It is perfectly accurate. It was your third vote at the time I left my comment. Your behavior at this page suggests WP:NOTHERE.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:37, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
 * I could accuse you of the same per WP:DISRUPTIVE. You insist on discrediting every vote that doesn't align with yours.Tombarks (talk) 17:59, 26 January 2022 (UTC) WP:SOCKSTRIKE see Sockpuppet investigations/Anthonyjmel  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:54, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep: per the reason provided above by . There have been significant improvements to the article since this discussion began. Anthonyjmel (talk) 06:20, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Fourth edit of this user--Ymblanter (talk) 06:25, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Actually, it was their first. It was, however, at the very least your fifth. As an admin you should know how inappropriate it is to be policing an XfD that you started. VanIsaac, MPLLcont WpWS 02:41, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
 * First on this page and fourth overall on Wikipedia.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:23, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
 * I agree with Isaac, Ymblanter is taking this personally. Per WP:EW and WP:HAR, you are disrupting this entire process. I just read your immediate response to Isaac in the history of this page... Very very unlike an administrator at all. Tombarks (talk) 12:08, 2 February 2022 (UTC) WP:SOCKSTRIKE see Sockpuppet investigations/Anthonyjmel  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:54, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
 * A correct venue to make this point is not here, but at WP:ANI or WP:AN.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:10, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
 * I will. Ymblanter obviously has no remorse for his actions despite being corrected repeatedly. Anthonyjmel (talk) 12:48, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
 * So it turns out that this is their fourth vote in this discussion, see Sockpuppet investigations/Anthonyjmel. The creator of the article and the sock blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:37, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
 * How do you mean? Anthonyjmel (talk) 06:34, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. As Ymblanter and Celestina007 have already stated, the subject has not demonstrated to pass WP:GNG. Most of the keep discussion is from the one primary author of the article. The sources all fall into three categories: WP:PRIMARY, WP:SELFPUBLISH, or WP:PASSING, none of which establish notability. Rollidan (talk) 23:07, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete - simply lacks significant coverage. Fails the WP:BASIC notability test for biographies. His poems are hosted on a few different websites but I can't find a single instance of anyone writing in great detail about Melekwe Anthony E. so it's a clear and obvious delete Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:49, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG.  Onel 5969  TT me 14:28, 3 February 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.