Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melinda Looi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  05:44, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

Melinda Looi

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:SIGCOV. Written like an advertisement. Few references beyond press releases. The references which are present are more puff pieces than independent reviews. Geoff &#124; Who, me? 03:56, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Fashion,  and Malaysia.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  06:21, 19 April 2024 (UTC)


 * hi There. May I know what is the problem with this wikipedia please? thanks. Melinda Looi (talk) 11:21, 19 April 2024 (UTC)— has only contributed to the article(s) under discussion for deletion and this XFD page. Shadow311 (talk) 19:11, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
 * The problem, according to the nominator, is "Fails WP:SIGCOV. Written like an advertisement. Few references beyond press releases. The references which are present are more puff pieces than independent reviews." Drmies (talk) 20:41, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Hi there, I'm sorry, but there is nothing in the article are puff pieces, as mentioned by the nominator. I'm from Malaysia, and I know Melinda Looi. The things here in wiki are actual facts about her. I object to this deletion and disagree with the nominator. Kunal5651 (talk) 03:11, 24 April 2024 (UTC) - — has only contributed to the article(s) under discussion for deletion and this XFD page. Cabayi (talk) 07:38, 24 April 2024 (UTC) }}
 * Delete the article since its only attribute of some note is the gallant effort to create notability out of thin air. We could point out the blatant failure to meet WP:GNG but one trusts the failure is evident. And the odor of promotion is overwhelming: We have kamikaze accounts, such as this or this working diligently on the wreckage. We even got a blocked account, such as this one. We might even have the subject itself creating it. Quite a gallery. -The Gnome (talk) 15:18, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete. Judging from the logs, this is an autobiographical advert that the subject is still actively maintaining. 128.252.210.1 (talk) 19:25, 24 April 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.