Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melionica bertha


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Eddie891 Talk Work 13:36, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Melionica bertha

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This article does not appear to be significant enough and there does not appear to be enough sources on the internet to justify it having its own Wikipedia page. Phanachet (talk) 05:54, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. Phanachet (talk) 05:54, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions. Phanachet (talk) 05:54, 25 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Comment. I don't know the guideline/policy offhand, but I am practically certain that if this is a genuine species, it will be kept. Is the nom's contention that this is not a genuine species? AleatoryPonderings (talk) 05:56, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:SPECIESOUTCOMES. Mccapra (talk) 06:43, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep. It is a species, with untold living organisms through the ages. Of course it is notable. Pikavoom (talk) 09:26, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep - a "finding out about WP:SPECIESOUTCOMES" stumble. Early closure / withdrawal suggested. -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 12:46, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep. Straightforward case of WP:SPECIESOUTCOMES. There's no way this article could ever be deleted with current sourcing establishing the species exists and is formally described. Kingofaces43 (talk) 17:34, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep - Sorry, but I think it’s time to withdraw this AfD. Foxnpichu (talk) 21:12, 25 September 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.