Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melissa Andersen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JForget 01:53, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

Melissa Andersen

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

fails WP:ENT quite clearly. Ironholds (talk) 00:23, 25 April 2010 (UTC)


 * [[Image:Symbol delete vote.svg|15px]] Delete — Per above. ℳøℕø 00:36, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, for lack of notability. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 02:42, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per the reasons I gave when this was prodded in the first place. I can't believe we have to let this drag for 7 days because someone removed the tag by citing a goddamned IMDB entry as "proof"  /sigh Tarc (talk) 13:14, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
 * See WP:CONTESTED. Anybody can remove a PROD tag for any reason, whether or not they cite anything else as proof. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 17:38, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Just because they can does not mean they should, especially without a valid reason. This is a godawful loophole in the prod policy if it lets any newbie remove a tag for any reason of their whim. Tarc (talk) 17:42, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Maybe they shouldn't, but that's the point of PROD -- it can only be used for uncontested deletions that nobody objects to. If anybody objects to deletion of the article, PROD is not the right process under which to delete it. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 18:20, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Maybe I just expect a higher degree of common sense from other editors when they choose to contest a deletion. Oh well... Tarc (talk) 19:48, 25 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:07, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:07, 25 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Blue Heelers where common sense indicates this person has whatever slim notabiliy she might.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 03:26, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
 * While it makes sense to me that her actually recurring in 8 episodes of the show so far might then merit her inclusion in the list of recurrings over at Blue Heelers or at List of recurring Blue Heelers characters, its obvious that no one wishes even that. I give.  No doubt someone will add her to one of two places later.   Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 10:38, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as failing WP:ENTERTAINER. I oppose a redirect on the grounds that her character was only ever a bit part on the show, and hasn't even been adjudged worthy of an entry at List of recurring Blue Heelers characters.  Lankiveil (speak to me) 06:22, 26 April 2010 (UTC).
 * Delete as non-notable per WP:ENT. StAnselm (talk) 10:19, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per clearing failing WP:ENT. Xtzou ( Talk ) 18:16, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.