Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melissa Hastings


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) ansh 666 02:58, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Melissa Hastings

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fictional character which does not pass WP:GNG.  Onel 5969  TT me 12:49, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:43, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:43, 16 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep Michigan Avenue, Entertainment Tonight, EW, and Wetpaint to demonstrate ongoing coverage from this week. Never seen a single ep, never heard of the character before the AfD, and yet I can find all these sources trivially.  Isn't that what WP:BEFORE is for? Jclemens (talk) 15:48, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep: A fictional character that does pass WP:GNG. I agree with Jclemens. What is up with AfD nominators not searching first? It wouldn't waste other editor's time. SL93 (talk) 00:27, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep per above comments. Aoba47 (talk) 16:09, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:33, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:33, 21 April 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.