Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melissa Moore (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  02:00, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Melissa Moore
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This Page seems to have been recreated this time as a puff-piece for some horse-trainer, it is not written in NPOV, contains no references except to the horsey lady's personal website, and the subject is not notable. Declan (talk) 21:09, 31 January 2009 (UTC) 
 * Note: I have created a new discussion page for this nomination as it was created on the discussion page for the first AfD discussion of April 2007 in error. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:42, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Further note: The subject of the article deleted by the earlier AfD was a different person to that in the current article. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:42, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Further note: Sorry, yes the first discussion was for a musician (who I was looking for, although I don't dispute her non-notability) this is for a new page for a different lady. --Declan (talk)
 * Keep - The tone of the article is too promotional, but she is notable due to her multiple world championships. There is at least one reliable source for that claim  --Megaboz (talk) 20:03, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:50, 5 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep – appears to be a notable actress in many roles. Needs reliable sources, but should be kept.  TheAE  talk / sign  06:07, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  22:31, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - While the article has a lot of issues, this person seems to have at least a modicum of notability. It needs work, not deletion. Wildhartlivie (talk) 12:46, 8 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.