Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melody Publishing Company (Taiwan)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --Salix (talk): 16:39, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Melody Publishing Company (Taiwan)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Organisational advert masquerading as an article. Fails WP:BASIC and WP:ORG. References are orgs. own website with very minor third party news source. scope_creep (talk) 20:02, 14 April 2013 (UTC)


 * I think you need to reword the opening sentence. Phil Bridger (talk) 20:08, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
 * It still doesn't make sense. Surely you mean "advert masquerading as an article" rather than "advert masquerading as an advert" or "article masquerading as an advert"? Are you sure that you understand the words that you are writing? And are you sure that you are in the right frame of mind today to be writing deletion nominations? Phil Bridger (talk) 20:38, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
 * That looks better. I hope you didn't take offence at my previous post - we all have the occasional brain fart. Phil Bridger (talk) 20:44, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Taiwan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:31, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:32, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:32, 14 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete No evidence of notability. Prior to this instance of the article, there were several prior versions (also featuring interesting use of English), all of which were speedy-deleted, and their contributing editor was blocked. If this AfD results in deletion, it would be worth also salting this and the previous variant names. AllyD (talk) 20:44, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.