Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melville Davisson Post


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy Nom withdrawn. No delete votes  TravellingCari  22:09, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Melville Davisson Post

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested speedy. Sam Blab 23:04, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep and well it ought to have been contested. Author of a dozen of so books by major publishers. Article says that he was "not  prolific", but I do not know who the comparison is with.  By any reasonable standard an author is both prolific and notable who is the  author of 10 short story collections in book form, (one of which is in project Gutenberg, one of which, though Americana, was reprinted in the UK),-- and many collected modern editions, such as  Post, M. D. (1977). The complete Uncle Abner. The Mystery library, 4. San Diego: University Extension, University of California. No attempt made to look for secondary  sources to confirm it--and even out template above is enough to show them. from G Books, a modern work of criticism from a major publisher: Norton, C. A. (1974). Melville Davisson Post: man of many mysteries. Bowling Green, Ohio: Bowling Green University Popular Press. Inclusion in multiple  modern anthologies, a few of many Best american mystery stories of the century. (2001). Boston: Mariner Books; Greene, D. G. (1999). Classic mystery stories.. Mineola, N.Y.: Dover Publications.  Discussed in many other academic and popular works--see G Books and G S for details. And, finally,. had an O Henry Prize story for 1920. . DGG (talk) 23:57, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep On top of everything DGG said, he's in the American National Biography. Zagalejo^^^ 00:11, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep per DGG and Zagalejo. Found some easy information in Scholar as well. Article needing improvement is not a reason for deletion. TravellingCari  17:07, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  21:23, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Oi! I withdraw.  How wrong can one person be?  Sam  Blab 21:36, 6 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.