Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Members of the Malaysian Parliament who have served for at least 30 years


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus is to keep, but not necessarily in the current shape or format. (non-admin closure) w umbolo   ^^^  07:25, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

Members of the Malaysian Parliament who have served for at least 30 years

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Just trivia. Why not 25 years? ―Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:13, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

See Members of the Australian Parliament who have served for at least 30 years and Members of the New Zealand Parliament who have served for at least 30 years as example. Are you considering both of them as trivia? Panji Keramat (talk) 06:17, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
 * I am. Thank you. ―Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:42, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:01, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:01, 22 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep This is an absolutely valid encyclopedic type. Thirty years is a long time to be part of the parliament in a democratic nation. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 15:43, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
 * So is 29 or 31. ―Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:16, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
 * 30 is a nice round number. I would support changing the inclusion criteria to either 29 or 31 years. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 20:55, 23 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep I agree with the proposition from Kiwichris at Articles for deletion/Members of the New Zealand Parliament who have served for at least 30 years to bring this article into line with List of members of the United States Congress by longevity of service which is more logically laid out. This also applies to the two other related AfD's. Meets WP:GNG. NealeFamily (talk) 00:26, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep. Per NealeFamily's rationale. The Drover&#39;s Wife (talk) 00:37, 23 August 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.