Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Memetic engineer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was redirect. Ingoolemo talk 05:58, 10 November 2005 (UTC)

Memetic engineer
Original research Isolani 20:35, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete dicdef, apparently already transwiki'd. - Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] 21:17, 3 November 2005 (UTC) Redirect per Uncle G - although I am suspicious of this term, it has a strong whiff of marketing about it. - Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] 08:14, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. --JiFish(Talk/Contrib) 21:25, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Change vote to Redirect to memetic engineering. --JiFish(Talk/Contrib) 00:55, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Surely a memetic engineer is one who practices memetic engineering? Uncle G 00:36, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect to memetic engineering per Uncle G. howcheng   [ t &#149; c &#149; w &#149;  e  ] 00:52, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect per Unca G. -- Captain Disdain 04:43, 4 November 2005 (UTC)


 * Keep memetic engineering Additions and edits from original writer of Memetic Engineer and Memetic Envisioneering. Original writer per previous delete requests. Entry writer currently teaches classes on the subject. Also per redirect. You cannot have a field of study without it first having been pioneered. Meaning you cannot have Engineering without there first being an Engineer. per Just zis Guy, you know? You should not opt to delete a term just because you had not heard of it. Please research first and do not make delete decisions on opinions. Apparently you didn't know it was even indexed already. elohimgenius  [ t &#149; c; 03:02, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
 * I don't see any information in this article that couldn't be added to memetic engineering. Note that Genetic engineer redirects to Genetic engineering. I don't see why it shouldn't be so for memetic engineer. --JiFish(Talk/Contrib) 11:42, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Correction, we don't have an article called "Genetic engineer". But if we did it would redirect to Genetic engineering. --JiFish(Talk/Contrib) 11:46, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment: Mechanical engineer &rarr; Mechanical engineering; Aerospace engineer &rarr; Aerospace engineering; Electrical engineer &rarr; Electrical engineering. Tell me why this should be any different. (Curiously, though Civil engineer has its own article, but Civil Engineer (note capital E) is a redirect). -- howcheng  [ t &#149; c &#149; w &#149;  e  ] 16:44, 4 November 2005 (UTC)


 * Hmm, good poing JFish I agree. Redirect to Memetic Engineering --ElohimGenius(Talk/Contrib)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.