Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Memetic institutionalism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 21:58, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

Memetic institutionalism

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable term. Not every new term written in a book needs an article. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 21:52, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 21:52, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 21:52, 2 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete agree with nom. Balle010 (talk) 06:00, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete: The article has been created by the WP:SPA author himself (User:Mikael_Sandberg) who tried to add it to various related Wikipedia articles. Unfortunately, aside the obvious WP:COI, the term has failed to gain traction in the academia, I see only 1-2 works not authored by Sandberg that use it in passing, and as such,it fails WP:GNG. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 06:49, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Zero sources to peer-reviewed journals or books that would prove this is notable. Author made up a term. Need proof of life. Oaktree b (talk) 20:21, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. We don't publish original research. Bearian (talk) 21:31, 9 November 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.