Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Memetics:Memetic defence quotient

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was SPEEDY DELETED. dbenbenn | talk 08:09, 12 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Memetics:Memetic defence quotient
The only result I get when searching for "memetic defence quotient" in Google is the Wikipedia article on Meme. Evil Monkey&#8756;Hello 05:12, Feb 6, 2005 (UTC)


 * Looks like nonsense to me. Delete. -- Cyrius|&#9998; 05:16, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. nonsense. RJFJR 06:17, Feb 6, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. This article was rejected by my memetic defenses. --Zarquon 07:17, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Article outside of any recognised Namespace. Author claims on xyr talk page not to be creating test pages.  ("I don't experiment and I'm not a 5 year old")  Thus Speedy delete under criterion #3. Uncle G 19:00, 2005 Feb 6 (UTC)
 * Speedy deleted as fabricated nonsense. silsor 08:09, Feb 7, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.