Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Memoirs: 1939-1993


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was '''speedy keep. Non-admin closure.  TN ‑ X - Man  15:07, 11 September 2008 (UTC)'''

Memoirs: 1939-1993

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Relatively unknown book. Not worthy of an article IMO Chatmantoo (talk) 11:26, 8 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Could much of the information be merged into the main Brian Mulroney article - perhaps under the memoirs section - rather than being deleted A.C. Norman (talk) 15:59, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I agree. Merge info to appropriate section in Brian Mulroney. Pie is good   (Apple is the best)  20:40, 8 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep. It is the autobiography of a Canadian prime minister. Lots of sources. Easily passes notability standard and Notability (books). --maclean 01:56, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Well-sourced autobiography of a notable figure — and given that nominating this for deletion is Chatmantoo's first-ever Wikipedia edit under this username, I strongly suspect a less neutral and more partisan Mulroney-bashing motivation than advertised here. Bearcat (talk) 02:18, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.   —Bearcat (talk) 02:21, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. If autobiographies warrant articles unto themselves, then this one clearly meets the requirements, per maclean's comments.   PK  T  13:13, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep. An autobiography of a former Canadian PM is clearly notable, and merits a WP article. I suggest this new user read the criteria for notability and inclusion on WP. Mind  matrix  13:21, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  19:30, 9 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep . Clearly noted, thus notable. This editor's sole contribution is this nomination and seems in bad-faith. Double Blue  (Talk) 22:14, 9 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.