Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Memoirs of Hadrian (film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. A request can be left at WP:AN if the content is needed later on. —Wknight94 (talk) 01:20, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Memoirs of Hadrian (film)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Explicitly fails future film notability guidelines. Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 08:44, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak keep While I agree it fails "films that have already begun shooting, but have not yet been publicly released (theatres or video), should not have their own articles, unless the production itself is notable per notability guidelines. " I think the article does no harm at the moment, and will start to expand soon after release of the movie. Therefore I am not convinced that deletion at the moment is necessary. Arnoutf (talk) 10:51, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm its creator - sorry, on creation I thought the film was closer to release than it actually is. Rather than deletion, I suggest Redirect for now, back to Memoirs of Hadrian, with the material remerged back into there, then re-stub it out to Memoirs of Hadrian (film) when the film actually comes out. Neddyseagoon - talk 22:04, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Nothing to indicate this in-production film meets the notability guidelines for unreleased films. The article can be recreated when more reliable sources are available. Darkspots (talk) 13:08, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NFF as there has been no production news since 2005. I found a print source  that quotes Boorman (the director): At 74, he is already planning his next project, an adaptation of Marguerite Yourcenar's bestseller Memoirs of Hadrian, recreating the life of the Roman emperor. "It's a daunting prospect. The book is almost too good, but has some fascinating parallels with the present American empire," he says.  The project was announced back in 2004, and there's been no recent news besides this continued intent to make the film, which is not enough.  All the meager information should be placed at Memoirs of Hadrian. — Erik  (talk • contrib) - 18:17, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.   — Erik  (talk • contrib) - 18:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - Geez, all these articles on films that don't even exist get a tiny bit to my nerves (even if the idea of a film on Yourcenar's book is interesting).--Aldux (talk) 22:07, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I agree; that's why I think WP:NFF is a good idea because having its own article gives the illusion that, yep, it's definitely gonna be a film. If it's in a "Film adaptation" section of the article of its source material, you're more aware that it's just being developed and not guaranteed, like Shantaram. — Erik  (talk • contrib) - 22:09, 22 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.