Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Memoria negra


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. No arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:27, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

Memoria negra

 * – ( View AfD View log )

non notable film, failing WP:NFILM prod removed by creator, one of several films all from the same festival created by this same editor. Most nominated (excepting those winning several awards given then benefit of the doubt) Gaijin42 (talk) 17:11, 9 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep Covered in multiple sources and very interesting subject matter.♦ Dr. Blofeld  20:31, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 15:07, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 15:07, 10 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep Covered in multiple, easily found sources. Meets WP:NF.  Rather than nominate all these film stubs on African cinema in order to punish their author, the project would be far better served by allowing them to be improved through regular editing. We do not disrupt Wikipedia to make a point.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 05:32, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep Well-sourced enough, and multiple festivals says it's notable. First Light (talk) 20:21, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep All notable mutliple sources are covered in the Wikipedia guidelines. --GoShow (...............) 18:49, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.