Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Memosnag


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:57, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Memosnag

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NSOFT. Sources are either stores, lists of apps, or a passing mention as an example of an app in a given category. PGWG (talk) 14:30, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. PGWG (talk) 14:30, 16 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete: A WP:SPA article on a software item. The given references are listings, online zines etc. The reference supporting the "considered among the best" assertion appears to be based on 3 user-submitted ratings. I am seeing nothing to indicate that this product meets WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 18:45, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete every app does not get their own article. This one has no in-depth coverage, and at least would be way too soon. W Nowicki (talk) 18:55, 21 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.