Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Men Who Have Defeated The Undertaker


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete.  K ilo-Lima|(talk) 14:05, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

Men Who Have Defeated The Undertaker
This little bit of trivial information doesn't warrent it's own article. At the most, it should be merged into the Undertaker article because alone the article isnt encyclopedic enough to hold it's own. If it's not important enough to keep; then delete. M o e  ε  20:03, 10 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Obvious merge to the Undertaker's page. Alba 20:19, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete -  per WP:NOT.--Toffile 22:56, 10 April 2006 (UTC)d
 * Delete listcruft. Danny Lilithborne 05:01, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete too long a list of non-notable information to bother with a merge into The Undertaker MLA 08:54, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, but rename to List of people who have defeated The Undertaker or "list of men" or something. I think it's rather interesting to point out that only 21 men have defeated The Undertaker in his long WWE career.  If keeping it as is isn't gonna happen, my next solution would be to merge to the Undertaker's page.  ekedolphin 09:54, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as listcruft. - Rynne 17:44, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as listcruft, briefly mention the number of defeats on the wrestler's article (if it isn't already). Sandstein 19:56, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete or merge as per above. McPhail 20:07, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete non useful and trivial list as well as being WWE-cruft. Pegasus1138 Talk 22:30, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Kayfabecruft. I would support a List of people that Sid Eudy has threatened with a squeegee, however.  young  american  (talk) 02:14, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
 * merge - it's a surprisingly short list, and merits keeping, IMO. FleetfootMike 10:51, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge or keep, the Undertaker is an iconic figure. Kappa 09:56, 15 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.