Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Men going their own way


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and salt--Ymblanter (talk) 08:10, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Men going their own way

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Seems very WP:NEO &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;   &#9743;(talk)  01:42, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:12, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:12, 27 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete – Newish catchphrase trying to catch on. Plus, "No official publication or books is known yet." (Quoting the article itself.) &#8239;Senator2029 ➔ “Talk”&#8239; 13:02, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Not a notable concept, as the article admits (also, it seems to have been created as a form of promotion). --Colapeninsula (talk) 20:24, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
 * FYI: Men Going Their Own Way was deleted in 2007. Sancho 20:12, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
 * As was MGTOW, 4 times. Sancho 20:15, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wow.  According to the deletion history, these phrases may need to be salted. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:11, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.