Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Men of Honor


 * This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.

The result of the debate was keep. &mdash;Korath (Talk) 11:45, Apr 9, 2005 (UTC)

Men of Honor
Movie entries are ok, but this one is, how shall I say, crap. -- Dcfleck 02:55, 2005 Apr 3 (UTC)
 * Delete, article as it stands is un-encyclopaedic. Megan1967 03:41, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Strong keep. These articles need cleanup, not deletion. Xezbeth  05:49, Apr 3, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Any Hollywood film is noteworthy and encyclopedic (even if it stars Cuba Gooding Jr.). Paradiso 05:53, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * *Ouch!* There's nothing (inherently) wrong with Cuba Gooding, Jr. He's just as capable of making goood films (this one, Boyz N the Hood, as bad ones (Snow Dogs, Boat Trip)--FuriousFreddy 16:33, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. I've seen worse. If it looks like shit, then do research and edit it. Mike H 09:41, Apr 3, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep notable Hollywood movies. Crappy articles can be cleaned up by editing them. Mgm|(talk) 10:15, Apr 3, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, it has been rewritten and expanded into a decent article since it was listed. -- Infrogmation 12:36, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * As it has been completely re-written, I will now say Keep as well. -- Dcfleck 13:58, 2005 Apr 3 (UTC)
 * Keep. VfD is not cleanup. --FuriousFreddy 16:33, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Bogus (non-policy) nomination - David Gerard 09:45, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Strong keep. The end of mankind is nearby. -- Darwinek 08:01, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)


 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.