Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meniscus Tears


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Tear of meniscus. Brandon (talk) 08:02, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

Meniscus Tears

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Much better article already exists, Tear of meniscus. Article creator continues to revert to this version and has ignored my attempts to communicate. Beach drifter (talk) 19:52, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt; the preferable solution would be to redirect to Tear of meniscus however Beach drifters good faith attempts at communication have been repeatedly ignored. J04n(talk page) 20:04, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect and if the editor continues to revert after reaching consensus it can be dealt with appropriately. I don't think deleting and salting would be the best option.  Narthring (talk  • contribs) 03:46, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Tear of meniscus. Edward321 (talk) 03:52, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect Article creator is ignoring Beach drifter... so what? No offense, but one user not communicating with another user isn't an argument in an AfD.  Keep the good article, lose this one, and if Meniscus Tears comes back, speedy it.  If acj44 starts downgrading Tear of meniscus to match the nominated article, deal with him through other means.  Bradjamesbrown (talk) 05:03, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect and full protect. Needs a sysop to do the close. Tim Song (talk) 00:05, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.