Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Menon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep. Bad faith nom in violaton of WP:POINT. Non-admin closure.  N F 24 (radio me!) 13:42, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Menon

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

No reference, unvarifiable content. Covered in Nair article. A Long list of unreferenced unvarifiable listing of people.Vvmundakkal 10:58, 3 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep: This article is related to a community which has a significant populace in India. The Menons have an interesting history as can be seen here. Moreover, I dont see that Menons are covered in the Nair article, I could not find even the word "Menon" in that article. The Menon article needs cleaning up but that is no reason for it to be deleted. -- ¿Amar៛ Talk to me / My edits 12:10, 3 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletions. -- ¿Amar៛ Talk to me / My edits 12:14, 3 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Woah, deleting this article is too drastic. There is no scope for falsehood of information in this article. As I said before references are few for small topics such as this, that doesn't mean every small article in WP without references should be deleted.B Nambiar 02:07, 4 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep and turn into a disambiguation page. There are several people with the last name Menon. The information about the community can go to Nair page. utcursch | talk 04:07, 4 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep. WP:POINT listing and probably retaliation for not allowing his edit warring at Ezhava. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 05:01, 4 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep. I was searching for some insight into the origins of Menons and this is the only article I found. I think we should keep this article and try enhancing the content instead of deleting it. -- Abhilash (talk) 11:55, 6 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.