Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mephion

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was speedy deleted by Andrewa (Reposted material, CSD general case #4) --cesarb 01:30, 7 May 2005 (UTC)

Mephion
This page is back after having been deleted before, previous VFD referenced below. Looks like some mythology has been invented to pad the article and try to save it from being deleted again, but I can find zero sources to back up the claims that Mephion was a mythological dragon. Delete on the basis that it is unverifiable and a bad attempt at hiding bandcruft behind something purportedly more inclusion-worthy. Arkyan 16:48, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy deleted, Criteria for speedy deletion criterion #4: Reposted material. This archive page should probably be reverted to its former state when discussion originally closed, but I'm not sure where to document this recreation and redeletion. Andrewa 17:46, 1 May 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete. This sentence from Google is why: "Your search - mephion "santa clarita" - did not match any documents. "  "Mephion" by itself got 269 results. -You can also probably speedy it under "recreation of deleted material". -Idont Havaname 17:47, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Done, see above. Andrewa 17:56, 1 May 2005 (UTC)


 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 12:03, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Mephion
Currently fails to pass the Notability and Music Guidelines. Zzyzx11 06:56, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. A 3-month-old band? Is that a new record for VfD? android&harr;talk 07:06, Apr 2, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable, band vanity. Megan1967 09:03, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable. utcursch | talk 12:16, Apr 2, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Plug piece for new, non-influential band with no major commercial success. 3 months is nothing, we had one band put up about three days after they were founded. As I said then, bands that new are only notable if they have someone very famous in them. Average Earthman 16:50, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. --Smithfarm
 * Delete as bandcruft. I think the record for the newest band with a vanity article was for a group less than three days old!  I got a chuckle out of that one. - Lucky 6.9 04:43, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment: Looks like Average Earthman remembers that three-day-old group as well. - Lucky 6.9 04:43, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.